For he had possession of flocks, and possession of herds, and great store of servants: and the Philistines envied him.
GENESIS 26:14KJVWhat does Genesis 26:14 mean?
Genesis 26:14 describes how Isaac became very wealthy, owning many flocks, herds, and a large number of servants, which led the Philistines to envy him. The verse highlights the growing tension caused by Isaac’s prosperity among his neighbors.
In this part of Genesis, the focus is on Isaac, Abraham’s son, living in the region of Gerar among the Philistines. The verse comes after God blesses Isaac, causing his wealth to increase rapidly. The Philistines, who lived nearby, noticed Isaac’s success and began to feel jealous, which sets the stage for later conflicts in the chapter.
The Hebrew behind Genesis 26:14
- The word for “possession” is מִקְנֶה (miqneh), which often refers to acquired livestock or property. Its use here underlines that Isaac’s wealth was tangible and visible, not just abstract.
- “Flocks” is צֹאן (tso’n), meaning sheep or small livestock, and “herds” is בָּקָר (baqar), meaning cattle. Mentioning both shows the breadth of Isaac’s wealth in different kinds of animals.
- “Store” is רָבָה (rabbah), meaning “great” or “abundant.” This emphasizes that Isaac did not just have a few servants, but a very large number, marking him as a powerful figure.
- The Philistines are called פְּלִשְׁתִּים (Pelishtim), identifying the specific neighboring group who felt envy, which is קָנָא (qanah), a word that can mean to be jealous or to burn with envy, suggesting strong feelings rather than mild resentment.
Why Genesis 26:14 matters
- This verse clarifies that Isaac’s wealth was not just spiritual or symbolic, but practical and visible, which helps explain why the Philistines reacted so strongly.
- The mention of the Philistines’ envy sets up the conflict that follows in the chapter, where they take action against Isaac because of their jealousy.
- Seeing the specific words for different kinds of wealth and envy helps the reader understand the real social and economic tensions at play, not just personal feelings.