Then wrote Rehum the chancellor, and Shimshai the scribe, and the rest of their companions; the Dinaites, the Apharsathchites, the Tarpelites, the Apharsites, the Archevites, the Babylonians, the Susanchites, the Dehavites, and the Elamites,
EZRA 4:9KJVWhat does Ezra 4:9 mean?
Ezra 4:9 lists the officials and groups who opposed the rebuilding of Jerusalem’s temple, naming Rehum the chancellor, Shimshai the scribe, and a variety of peoples living in the region. This verse shows the wide coalition of local leaders and communities who joined together to challenge the Jewish returnees’ efforts.
The verse is part of a letter sent to King Artaxerxes by these officials, trying to halt the rebuilding work. The named groups—such as the Dinaites, Babylonians, and Elamites—reflect the diverse population that the Assyrian and Babylonian empires had settled in the area after earlier conquests. This background helps explain why there was such organized opposition to the Jewish project.
The Aramaic behind Ezra 4:9
- "Chancellor" (סְפָרָא, sapharā’): This word, transliterated as sapharā’, refers to a high-ranking official or counselor, showing that Rehum held a significant administrative position in the Persian provincial government.
- "Scribe" (סָפַר, saphar): The term saphar means a secretary or record-keeper, highlighting Shimshai’s role in drafting and managing official correspondence.
- The list of peoples (e.g., Dinaites, Apharsathchites, Babylonians): These names point to various ethnic groups relocated to Samaria and surrounding regions by previous empires, underlining the mixed and sometimes tense population makeup.
Why Ezra 4:9 matters
- This verse clarifies that opposition to the rebuilding was not just from a single group but from a broad alliance of officials and settlers with different backgrounds and interests.
- By naming specific groups, Ezra 4:9 connects the local resistance to the larger imperial policy of population mixing, which often led to friction and suspicion between communities.
- The detailed listing of officials and peoples sets up the seriousness of the opposition and the formal, bureaucratic nature of the complaint sent to the Persian king, helping readers understand the political challenges faced by the Jewish returnees.