But Jonathan heard not when his father charged the people with the oath: wherefore he put forth the end of the rod that was in his hand, and dipped it in an honeycomb, and put his hand to his mouth; and his eyes were enlightened.
1 SAMUEL 14:27KJVWhat does 1 Samuel 14:27 mean?
1 Samuel 14:27 describes how Jonathan, unaware of his father's command for the people to fast, dipped his staff into a honeycomb, ate some honey, and felt physically revived as a result. Jonathan did not hear Saul’s oath, so he unknowingly broke the fast, and the honey immediately refreshed him.
The verse takes place during a difficult time for Israel’s army, led by King Saul, who had ordered everyone not to eat until evening. Jonathan, Saul’s son, had not heard this command because he was elsewhere. The verse highlights Jonathan’s innocent action and the immediate effect of the honey, which “enlightened” his eyes—meaning he regained energy and alertness.
The Hebrew behind 1 Samuel 14:27
- "Enlightened" (אָרוּ / 'or): This word means to give light or to brighten. In this context, it describes Jonathan’s eyes becoming brighter or more alert, a Hebrew way of saying he was physically revived.
- "Honeycomb" (יַעֲרַת דְּבַשׁ / ya'arat devash): The phrase refers to a piece of honeycomb, not just liquid honey, showing Jonathan took honey directly from a natural source, which was a rare and valuable food in ancient Israel.
- "Charged" and "oath" (שָׁבַע / shava'): Both words come from the same Hebrew root, meaning to swear or make an oath. This emphasizes that Saul’s command was not just a suggestion but a binding, serious vow.
Why 1 Samuel 14:27 matters
- The verse explains why Jonathan later faces trouble for breaking the oath, even though he did so unknowingly, setting up a key conflict in the chapter.
- The detail about Jonathan’s eyes being “enlightened” helps readers understand the physical toll Saul’s command had on the people and how even a small amount of food could make a big difference.
- This moment highlights the contrast between Saul’s strict leadership and Jonathan’s practical action, which becomes important for understanding both characters in the wider story.