The ten sons of Haman the son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews, slew they; but on the spoil laid they not their hand.
ESTHER 9:10KJVWhat does Esther 9:10 mean?
Esther 9:10 states that the Jews killed the ten sons of Haman, who had been their enemy, but they did not take any of the possessions or wealth ("spoil") of those they defeated. The verse highlights both the defeat of Haman's family and the restraint shown by the Jews in not claiming material gain from their victory.
This verse comes in the context of the Jews defending themselves against those who sought to destroy them, as allowed by the king’s decree. Haman, once a powerful official who plotted against the Jews, is already dead, and now his ten sons are also killed. The specific mention that the Jews did not lay hands on the spoil shows their focus was on justice and survival, not on personal enrichment.
The Hebrew behind Esther 9:10
- "Spoil" (שָׁלָל, shalal): This word refers to goods or property taken in war. The verse’s emphasis that the Jews did not take the "shalal" underlines their motives were not greed or revenge, but self-defense.
- "Laid" (שָׁלַח, shalach): This verb means to send, stretch out, or lay. Here, it is used to show deliberate restraint—the Jews did not "stretch out their hand" to take anything.
- "Hand" (יָד, yad): In Hebrew, "yad" often symbolizes power or action. The phrase "laid they not their hand" is a common way of saying they did not take action to seize goods, reinforcing their self-control.
Why Esther 9:10 matters
- The verse clarifies that the Jews’ actions were not motivated by a desire for wealth, which helps counter any accusation of opportunism or greed.
- By specifically naming Haman’s ten sons, the verse ties the outcome directly to the earlier threat against the Jews, showing the reversal of fortunes in the story.
- The restraint shown by not taking spoil connects this event to earlier biblical stories (like Saul and the Amalekites), adding a layer of meaning for readers familiar with those narratives.